As an adult I discovered more of Gannett's work. I marvel always at the clarity, boldness, vigor, and sure hand of her work.
What a little masterpiece!
And compare her own interpretation of Russian peasant culture with that of Rojankovsy's. The two are different---but is one better than the other? Yet though Gannett's work is of the same genius, quality, and calibre as other great illustrators I've highlighted in this blog, she is rarely spoken of. Read a bit more about her at this link: http://special.lib.umn.edu/findaid/xml/CLRC-31.xml. And please do read MISS HICKORY. You'll not find a better tale (or novel, even) about having to face and accept the uncomfortable realities of life.
Thank you, Wendy, I was unaware of Ruth. She had MAD drawing skills!
ReplyDeleteThank you Wendy,
ReplyDeleteI was unaware of Ruth. She had MAD drawing skills.
Oh, I ADORED Miss Hickory! and still do. I must get another copy, mine is long gone. I'll look for her other books, too. Thanks for sharing such illuminating art!
ReplyDeleteI, too, loved Miss Hickory. I have a harder time selling it to young readers today though.
ReplyDeleteYes, Library Jewel, unfortunately this is true...
DeleteEven though today's young readers aren't interested in these earlier books, it behooves those of us who are interested in the field of children's books---especially writers and illustrators---to be well-acquainted with what came before us. At least that is my philosophy. Perhaps knowing the history of one's chosen field is no longer in vogue either!
Delete